Data Entry: Please note that the research database will be replaced by UNIverse by the end of October 2023. Please enter your data into the system https://universe-intern.unibas.ch. Thanks

Login for users with Unibas email account...

Login for registered users without Unibas email account...

 
Embodied and spatial resources for turn-taking in institutional multi-party interactions: Participatory democracy debates
JournalArticle (Originalarbeit in einer wissenschaftlichen Zeitschrift)
 
ID 2496411
Author(s) Mondada, Lorenza
Author(s) at UniBasel Mondada, Lorenza
Year 2013
Title Embodied and spatial resources for turn-taking in institutional multi-party interactions: Participatory democracy debates
Journal Journal of pragmatics
Volume 46
Number 1
Pages / Article-Number 39-68
Abstract This paper addresses a central topic of conversation analysis: turn-taking organization. It describes a specific turn-taking system, characteristic of an institutional setting involving larger groups of participants. Whereas turn-taking has been widely studied and diverse settings have been considered, from informal everyday conversations to formal institutional interactions, turn-taking organization as it is managed by and within larger groups remains understudied. This paper aims to sketch the systematics of turn-taking practices within political meetings that are part of a participatory democracy project. In these meetings, everybody is expected to contribute ideas, opinions, and proposals; controversial topics, disagreements, and political oppositions are also expressed. The analysis focuses on the practical problems encountered by speakers bidding for turns and by the chairman trying to make the floor accessible. The analysis also examines the methodic and timed mobilization of embodied resources and their local accountability, as recognized and treated as situated by the participants. Systematic practices for pre-selecting, announcing and establishing the next speaker, selecting and queuing multiple next speakers, defending speakership in contexts of persistent overlaps, and managing confrontational exchanges during the debate are described in detail. This description casts light on the way in which ‘participatory democracy’ is locally brought into being.
Publisher Elsevier
ISSN/ISBN 0378-2166
edoc-URL http://edoc.unibas.ch/dok/A6254445
Full Text on edoc No
Digital Object Identifier DOI 10.1016/j.pragma.2012.03.010
ISI-Number WOS:000315071000004
Document type (ISI) Article
 
   

MCSS v5.8 PRO. 0.350 sec, queries - 0.000 sec ©Universität Basel  |  Impressum   |    
28/04/2024