Data Entry: Please note that the research database will be replaced by UNIverse by the end of October 2023. Please enter your data into the system https://universe-intern.unibas.ch. Thanks

Login for users with Unibas email account...

Login for registered users without Unibas email account...

 
Worry exposure versus applied relaxation in the treatment of generalized anxiety disorder
JournalArticle (Originalarbeit in einer wissenschaftlichen Zeitschrift)
 
ID 1722548
Author(s) Hoyer, J.; Beesdo, K.; Gloster, A. T.; Runge, J.; Höfler, M.; Becker, E. S.
Author(s) at UniBasel Gloster, Andrew
Year 2009
Title Worry exposure versus applied relaxation in the treatment of generalized anxiety disorder
Journal Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics
Volume 78
Number 2
Pages / Article-Number 106-15
Abstract BACKGROUND: Worry exposure (WE) is a core element of cognitive-behavioral treatment for generalized anxiety disorder (GAD). Its efficacy as a stand-alone treatment method (without further cognitive-behavioral therapy interventions) has never been tested.We aimed to examine whether WE alone is as efficacious as the empirically supported stand-alone treatment for GAD, applied relaxation (AR). METHODS: In a randomized controlled study, 73 outpatients meeting DSM-IV criteria for GAD as primary diagnosis were allocated to either WE or AR or a waiting list control group; in a 2nd randomization procedure the waiting list subjects were reallocated to WE or AR. The treatment was manualized (15 sessions with WE or AR), included 6-month and 1-year follow-ups, as well as last observation carried forward and completer analyses, and was controlled for allegiance effects.The Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale and the State-Trait Anxiety Scale were used as primary outcome measures. Self-report scales of anxiety, worrying and depression including negative metacognition about worrying and thought suppression served as secondary outcome measures. RESULTS: The dropout rate was moderate. The pre-/posttreatment effects were high for the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (standardized mean difference >1) and for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (standardized mean difference >0.87). The proportion of patients reaching high end state functioning was 48% (WE) and 56% (AR). WE and AR did not differ with regard to dropout rate or treatment effects. The treatment effects were stable at 6 month and 1 year follow-up. CONCLUSION: This is the first study to show that a stand-alone exposure in sensu technique--WE--is efficacious in the treatment of GAD. Both AR and WE seem to represent effective principles of change in GAD.
Publisher Karger
ISSN/ISBN 0033-3190 ; 1423-0348
edoc-URL http://edoc.unibas.ch/48951/
Full Text on edoc Available
Digital Object Identifier DOI 10.1159/000201936
PubMed ID http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19218829
ISI-Number WOS:000263534600006
Document type (ISI) Journal Article, Randomized Controlled Trial
 
   

MCSS v5.8 PRO. 0.351 sec, queries - 0.000 sec ©Universität Basel  |  Impressum   |    
03/05/2024