Data Entry: Please note that the research database will be replaced by UNIverse by the end of October 2023. Please enter your data into the system https://universe-intern.unibas.ch. Thanks

Login for users with Unibas email account...

Login for registered users without Unibas email account...

 
Pouched rats' detection of tuberculosis in human sputum : comparison to culturing and polymerase chain reaction
JournalArticle (Originalarbeit in einer wissenschaftlichen Zeitschrift)
 
ID 1634941
Author(s) Mahoney, Amanda; Weetjens, Bart J; Cox, Christophe; Beyene, Negussie; Reither, Klaus; Makingi, George; Jubitana, Maureen; Kazwala, Rudovick; Mfinanga, Godfrey S; Kahwa, Amos; Durgin, Amy; Poling, Alan
Author(s) at UniBasel Reither, Klaus
Year 2012
Title Pouched rats' detection of tuberculosis in human sputum : comparison to culturing and polymerase chain reaction
Journal Tuberculosis research and treatment
Volume 2012
Pages / Article-Number 716989
Abstract Setting. Tanzania. Objective. To compare microscopy as conducted in direct observation of treatment, short course centers to pouched rats as detectors of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Design. Ten pouched rats were trained to detect tuberculosis in sputum using operant conditioning techniques. The rats evaluated 910 samples previously evaluated by smear microscopy. All samples were also evaluated through culturing and multiplex polymerase chain reaction was performed on culture growths to classify the bacteria. Results. The patientwise sensitivity of microscopy was 58.0%, and the patient-wise specificity was 97.3%. Used as a group of 10 with a cutoff (defined as the number of rat indications to classify a sample as positive for Mycobacterium tuberculosis) of 1, the rats increased new case detection by 46.8% relative to microscopy alone. The average samplewise sensitivity of the individual rats was 68.4% (range 61.1-73.8%), and the mean specificity was 87.3% (range 84.7-90.3%). Conclusion. These results suggest that pouched rats are a valuable adjunct to, and may be a viable substitute for, sputum smear microscopy as a tuberculosis diagnostic in resource-poor countries.
Publisher Hindawi
edoc-URL http://edoc.unibas.ch/dok/A6094319
Full Text on edoc No
Digital Object Identifier DOI 10.1155/2012/716989
PubMed ID http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22848808
ISI-Number MEDLINE:22848808
Document type (ISI) Journal Article
 
   

MCSS v5.8 PRO. 0.622 sec, queries - 0.000 sec ©Universität Basel  |  Impressum   |    
10/05/2024