Data Entry: Please note that the research database will be replaced by UNIverse by the end of October 2023. Please enter your data into the system https://universe-intern.unibas.ch. Thanks

Login for users with Unibas email account...

Login for registered users without Unibas email account...

 
Uninformative polymorphisms bias genome scans for signatures of selection
JournalArticle (Originalarbeit in einer wissenschaftlichen Zeitschrift)
 
ID 1516603
Author(s) Roesti, Marius; Salzburger, Walter; Berner, Daniel
Author(s) at UniBasel Salzburger, Walter
Berner, Daniel
Year 2012
Title Uninformative polymorphisms bias genome scans for signatures of selection
Journal BMC Evolutionary Biology
Volume 12
Pages / Article-Number 94
Keywords Allele frequency distribution, FST, Gasterosteus aculeatus, Genetic marker, Hitchhiking, Population differentiation, Singleton
Mesh terms Animals; Gene Frequency; Genetic Markers; Genomics, methods; Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide; Selection, Genetic; Smegmamorpha, genetics
Abstract With the establishment of high-throughput sequencing technologies and new methods for rapid and extensive single nucleotide (SNP) discovery, marker-based genome scans in search of signatures of divergent selection between populations occupying ecologically distinct environments are becoming increasingly popular.; On the basis of genome-wide SNP marker data generated by RAD sequencing of lake and stream stickleback populations, we show that the outcome of such studies can be systematically biased if markers with a low minor allele frequency are included in the analysis. The reason is that these 'uninformative' polymorphisms lack the adequate potential to capture signatures of drift and hitchhiking, the focal processes in ecological genome scans. Bias associated with uninformative polymorphisms is not eliminated by just avoiding technical artifacts in the data (PCR and sequencing errors), as a high proportion of SNPs with a low minor allele frequency is a general biological feature of natural populations.; We suggest that uninformative markers should be excluded from genome scans based on empirical criteria derived from careful inspection of the data, and that these criteria should be reported explicitly. Together, this should increase the quality and comparability of genome scans, and hence promote our understanding of the processes driving genomic differentiation.
Publisher BioMed Central
ISSN/ISBN 1471-2148
edoc-URL http://edoc.unibas.ch/dok/A6070373
Full Text on edoc Available
Digital Object Identifier DOI 10.1186/1471-2148-12-94
PubMed ID http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22726891
ISI-Number WOS:000307937600001
Document type (ISI) Journal Article
 
   

MCSS v5.8 PRO. 0.363 sec, queries - 0.000 sec ©Universität Basel  |  Impressum   |    
05/05/2024