Data Entry: Please note that the research database will be replaced by UNIverse by the end of October 2023. Please enter your data into the system https://universe-intern.unibas.ch. Thanks

Login for users with Unibas email account...

Login for registered users without Unibas email account...

 
Use of B-type natriuretic peptide in the risk stratification of community-acquired pneumonia
JournalArticle (Originalarbeit in einer wissenschaftlichen Zeitschrift)
 
ID 1196441
Author(s) Christ-Crain, M.; Breidthardt, T.; Stolz, D.; Zobrist, K.; Bingisser, R.; Miedinger, D.; Leuppi, J.; Tamm, M.; Mueller, B.; Mueller, C.
Author(s) at UniBasel Müller, Christian
Leuppi, Jörg D.
Christ-Crain, Mirjam
Bingisser, Roland M.
Tamm, Michael
Müller, Beat
Year 2008
Title Use of B-type natriuretic peptide in the risk stratification of community-acquired pneumonia
Journal Journal of Internal Medicine
Volume 264
Number 2
Pages / Article-Number 166-176
Keywords biomarker, mortality, pneumonia
Abstract BACKGROUND: Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is the leading infectious cause of death in developed countries. Risk stratification has previously been difficult. METHODS: Markers of cardiac stress (B-type natriuretic peptide, BNP) and inflammation (C-reactive protein, white blood cell count, procalcitonin) as well as the pneumonia severity index (PSI) were determined in 302 consecutive patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with CAP. The accuracy of these parameters to predict death was evaluated as the primary endpoint. Prediction of treatment failure was considered as the secondary endpoint. RESULTS: B-type natriuretic peptide levels increased with rising disease severity as classified by the PSI (P = 0.015). BNP levels were significantly higher in nonsurvivors compared to survivors [median 439.2 (IQR 137.1-1384.6) vs. 114.3 (51.3-359.6) pg mL(-1), P > 0.001]. In a receiver operating characteristic analysis for the prediction of survival the area under the curve (AUC) for BNP was comparable to the AUC of the PSI (0.75 vs. 0.71, P = 0.52). Importantly, the combination of BNP and the PSI significantly improved the prognostic accuracy of the PSI alone (AUC 0.78 vs. 0.71; P = 0.02). The optimal cut-off for BNP was 279 pg mL(-1). The accuracy of BNP to predict treatment failure was identical to the accuracy to predict death (AUC 0.75). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with CAP, BNP levels are powerful and independent predictors of death and treatment failure. When used in conjunction with the PSI, BNP levels significantly improve the risk prediction when compared with the PSI alone.
Publisher Wiley
ISSN/ISBN 0954-6820 ; 1365-2796
edoc-URL http://edoc.unibas.ch/dok/A6006611
Full Text on edoc No
Digital Object Identifier DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2008.01934.x
PubMed ID http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18298480
ISI-Number WOS:000257514600007
Document type (ISI) Article
 
   

MCSS v5.8 PRO. 0.355 sec, queries - 0.000 sec ©Universität Basel  |  Impressum   |    
06/05/2024