Data Entry: Please note that the research database will be replaced by UNIverse by the end of October 2023. Please enter your data into the system https://universe-intern.unibas.ch. Thanks

Login for users with Unibas email account...

Login for registered users without Unibas email account...

 
Diagnostic accuracy of measurement methods to assess non-adherence to immunosuppressive drugs in kidney transplant recipients
JournalArticle (Originalarbeit in einer wissenschaftlichen Zeitschrift)
 
ID 1195857
Author(s) Schäfer-Keller, P; Steiger, J; Bock, A; Denhaerynck, K; De Geest, S
Author(s) at UniBasel De Geest, Sabina M.
Steiger, Jürg
Bock, H. Andreas
Year 2008
Title Diagnostic accuracy of measurement methods to assess non-adherence to immunosuppressive drugs in kidney transplant recipients
Journal American journal of transplantation
Volume 8
Number 3
Pages / Article-Number 616-26
Keywords Diagnostic value, kidney transplantation, medication adherence, medication compliance
Abstract Valid assessment of immunosuppressive therapy non-adherence (NAH) is vital: NAH is associated with negative transplantation outcomes. We studied the diagnostic accuracy of assay, patient self-reports and clinicians' collateral reports and composite adherence scores using electronic monitoring (EM) as a reference standard. This cross-sectional study included a convenience sample of 249 adult kidney transplant recipients (Ktx) (female: 43.4%; mean age 53.6 [SD: 12.7], median 7 years [IQR: 9 years] post-Ktx). NAH was assessed using EM over 3 months (i.e. reference standard), assays of cyclosporine, tacrolimus, mycophenolat-mofetil, patients' self-reports and clinicians' collateral reports. The constructed composite adherence score included assay, self-reports and collateral reports. NAH's prevalence across the measurement methods was EM: 17.3%; assay: 33% (cyclosporine: 25.8%; tacrolimus: 35.1%; mycophenolat-mofetil: 40.2%); self-report: 12.4%; collateral reports: 24.9% and composite adherence score: 38.9%, respectively. The composite adherence score and collateral reports showed the highest and lowest sensitivities to NAH (72.1% and 15.8%, respectively). Specificity was highest for collateral reports of at least three clinicians (93.1%). Likelihood ratio of a positive test was 2.74 for composite adherence score. No measures showed high sensitivity alongside high specificity. Combining measures increased diagnostic accuracy, indicating the relevance of combined measures for clinical and research purposes.
Publisher Munksgaard
ISSN/ISBN 1600-6135
edoc-URL http://edoc.unibas.ch/dok/A6006036
Full Text on edoc No
Digital Object Identifier DOI 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2007.02127.x
PubMed ID http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18294158
ISI-Number WOS:000253503600022
Document type (ISI) Journal Article
 
   

MCSS v5.8 PRO. 0.353 sec, queries - 0.000 sec ©Universität Basel  |  Impressum   |    
07/05/2024