Data Entry: Please note that the research database will be replaced by UNIverse by the end of October 2023. Please enter your data into the system Thanks

Login for users with Unibas email account...

Login for registered users without Unibas email account...

Respiratory symptoms following wildfire smoke exposure: airway size as a susceptibility factor
JournalArticle (Originalarbeit in einer wissenschaftlichen Zeitschrift)
ID 1195632
Author(s) Mirabelli, Maria C; Künzli, Nino; Avol, Edward; Gilliland, Frank D; Gauderman, W James; McConnell, Rob; Peters, John M
Author(s) at UniBasel Künzli, Nino
Year 2009
Title Respiratory symptoms following wildfire smoke exposure: airway size as a susceptibility factor
Journal Epidemiology
Volume 20
Number 3
Pages / Article-Number 451-9

BACKGROUND: Associations between exposure to smoke during wildfire events and respiratory symptoms are well documented, but the role of airway size remains unclear. We conducted this analysis to assess whether small airway size modifies these relationships. METHODS: We analyzed data from 465 nonasthmatic 16- to 19-year-old participants in the Children's Health Study. Following an outbreak of wildfires in 2003, each student completed a questionnaire about smoke exposure, dry and wet cough, wheezing, and eye symptoms. We used log-binomial regression to evaluate associations between smoke exposure and fire-related health symptoms, and to assess modification of the associations by airway size. As a marker of airway size, we used the ratio of maximum midexpiratory flow to forced vital capacity. RESULTS: Forty percent (186 of 465) of this population (including students from 11 of 12 surveyed communities) reported the odor of wildfire smoke at home. We observed increased respiratory and eye symptoms with increasing frequency of wildfire smoke exposure. Associations between smoke exposure and having any of 4 respiratory symptoms were stronger in the lowest quartile of the lung function ratio (eg, fire smoke 6+ days: prevalence ratio: 3.8; 95% confidence interval (CI = 2.0-7.2), compared with the remaining quartiles (fire smoke 6+ days: prevalence ratio = 2.0; 1.2-3.2). Analysis of individual symptoms suggests that this interaction may be strongest for effects on wheezing. CONCLUSIONS: Small airways may serve as a marker of susceptibility to effects of wildfire smoke. Future studies should investigate the role of airway size for more common exposures and should include persons with asthma

Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
ISSN/ISBN 1044-3983
Full Text on edoc No
Digital Object Identifier DOI 10.1097/EDE.0b013e31819d128d
PubMed ID
ISI-Number WOS:000265199800023
Document type (ISI) Journal Article

MCSS v5.8 PRO. 0.337 sec, queries - 0.000 sec ©Universität Basel  |  Impressum   |