Data Entry: Please note that the research database will be replaced by UNIverse by the end of October 2023. Please enter your data into the system https://universe-intern.unibas.ch. Thanks

Login for users with Unibas email account...

Login for registered users without Unibas email account...

 
Intravenous thrombolysis in stroke attributable to cervical artery dissection
JournalArticle (Originalarbeit in einer wissenschaftlichen Zeitschrift)
 
ID 1194341
Author(s) Engelter, Stefan T; Rutgers, Matthieu P; Hatz, Florian; Georgiadis, Dimitrios; Fluri, Felix; Sekoranja, Lucka; Schwegler, Guido; Müller, Felix; Weder, Bruno; Sarikaya, Hakan; Lüthy, Regina; Arnold, Marcel; Nedeltchev, Krassen; Reichhart, Marc; Mattle, Heinrich P; Tettenborn, Barbara; Hungerbühler, Hansjörg J; Sztajzel, Roman; Baumgartner, Ralf W; Michel, Patrik; Lyrer, Philippe A
Author(s) at UniBasel Engelter, Stefan
Year 2009
Title Intravenous thrombolysis in stroke attributable to cervical artery dissection
Journal Stroke : a journal of cerebral circulation : journal of the American Heart Association
Volume 40
Number 12
Pages / Article-Number 3772-6
Keywords carotid artery, cervical artery dissection, complications, dissection, outcome, thrombolysis
Abstract BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) for stroke seems to be beneficial independent of the underlying etiology. Whether this is also true for cervical artery dissection (CAD) is addressed in this study. METHODS: We used the Swiss IVT databank to compare outcome and complications of IVT-treated patients with CAD with IVT-treated patients with other etiologies (non-CAD patients). Main outcome and complication measures were favorable 3-month outcome, intracranial cerebral hemorrhage, and recurrent ischemic stroke. Modified Rankin Scale score <or=1 at 3 months was considered favorable. RESULTS: Fifty-five (5.2%) of 1062 IVT-treated patients had CAD. Patients with CAD were younger (median age 50 versus 70 years) but had similar median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale scores (14 versus 13) and time to treatment (152.5 versus 156 minutes) as non-CAD patients. In the CAD group, 36% (20 of 55) had a favorable 3-month outcome compared with 44% (447 of 1007) non-CAD patients (OR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.41 to 1.26), which was less favorable after adjustment for age, gender, and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score (OR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.27 to 0.95; P=0.03). Intracranial cerebral hemorrhages (asymptomatic, symptomatic, fatal) were equally frequent in CAD (14% [7%, 7%, 2%]) and non-CAD patients (14% [9%, 5%, 2%]; P=0.99). Recurrent ischemic stroke occurred in 1.8% of patients with CAD and in 3.7% of non-CAD-patients (P=0.71). CONCLUSIONS: IVT-treated patients with CAD do not recover as well as IVT-treated non-CAD patients. However, intracranial bleedings and recurrent ischemic strokes were equally frequent in both groups. They do not account for different outcomes and indicate that IVT should not be excluded in patients who may have CAD. Hemodynamic compromise or frequent tandem occlusions might explain the less favorable outcome of patients with CAD.
Publisher American Heart Association
ISSN/ISBN 0039-2499
edoc-URL http://edoc.unibas.ch/dok/A6004563
Full Text on edoc No
Digital Object Identifier DOI 10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.555953
PubMed ID http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19834022
ISI-Number WOS:000272663900018
Document type (ISI) Journal Article
 
   

MCSS v5.8 PRO. 0.384 sec, queries - 0.000 sec ©Universität Basel  |  Impressum   |    
10/05/2024