Data Entry: Please note that the research database will be replaced by UNIverse by the end of October 2023. Please enter your data into the system https://universe-intern.unibas.ch. Thanks

Login for users with Unibas email account...

Login for registered users without Unibas email account...

 
Surgical approach for a new knee prosthesis concept (TSTP) retaining both cruciate ligaments
JournalArticle (Originalarbeit in einer wissenschaftlichen Zeitschrift)
 
ID 1194300
Author(s) Nowakowski, Andrej M; Müller-Gerbl, Magdalena; Valderrabano, Victor
Author(s) at UniBasel Müller-Gerbl, Magdalena
Valderrabano, Victor
Nowakowski, Andrej
Year 2010
Title Surgical approach for a new knee prosthesis concept (TSTP) retaining both cruciate ligaments
Journal Clinical anatomy
Volume 23
Number 8
Pages / Article-Number 985-91
Keywords total knee arthroplasty, surgical technique, transversal support tibial plateau
Abstract

The transversal support tibial plateau (TSTP) concept was developed to retain both cruciate ligaments during total knee arthroplasty. TSTP design consists of two individual joint surfaces, reinforced beneath the joint line by two joint surface supports and buttressed by a single transversal support (TS). This configuration is devised to provide good bony anchoring especially for the TS, and to ensure long-term alignment of the individual joint surfaces. TS insertion requires a small extra incision. This study assessed techniques to implant the TS into the tibia. Using a specially designed aiming device, TS insertion from each side was evaluated in 13 human cadaveric knees (10 formalin-fixed, two Thiel embalmed, one fresh) at defined intervals of 15, 25, and 35 mm beneath the joint line. Particular attention was paid to potentially endangered structures, e.g., the medial collateral ligament (MCL), pes anserinus, and common peroneal nerve, as well as impediments to insertion, e.g., the fibula. TS implantation was successfully performed using both medial and lateral approaches. From medial, the TS was inserted safely at the 15 mm interval with the knee in maximum flexion and external rotation. With increasing intervals, however, the MCL and pes anserinus became progressively more susceptible to injury. In contrast, with the lateral approach, the operative field was quite close to the fibular head for the 25 mm interval. However, with the knee in extension, no other important structures were at risk.

Publisher Liss
ISSN/ISBN 0897-3806
edoc-URL http://edoc.unibas.ch/dok/A5841793
Full Text on edoc No
Digital Object Identifier DOI 10.1002/ca.21031
PubMed ID http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20949497
ISI-Number WOS:000284522900027
Document type (ISI) Journal Article
 
   

MCSS v5.8 PRO. 0.386 sec, queries - 0.000 sec ©Universität Basel  |  Impressum   |    
28/04/2024