Data Entry: Please note that the research database will be replaced by UNIverse by the end of October 2023. Please enter your data into the system https://universe-intern.unibas.ch. Thanks

Login for users with Unibas email account...

Login for registered users without Unibas email account...

 
Dementia diagnostics in primary care : a representative 8-year follow-up study in Lower Saxony, Germany
JournalArticle (Originalarbeit in einer wissenschaftlichen Zeitschrift)
 
ID 1194045
Author(s) Maeck, L.; Haak, S.; Knoblauch, A.; Stoppe, G.
Author(s) at UniBasel Stoppe, Gabriela
Year 2008
Title Dementia diagnostics in primary care : a representative 8-year follow-up study in Lower Saxony, Germany
Journal Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders
Volume 25
Number 2
Pages / Article-Number 127-34
Keywords primary care, dementia diagnostics, memory impairment, Alzheimer's disease, vascular dementia
Abstract AIM: To investigate whether primary-care physicians' competency regarding dementia diagnostics improved from 1993 to 2001. METHODS: In a representative follow-up survey 122 out of 170 (71.8%) family physicians (FPs) were randomly assigned to 2 written case samples presenting patients with slight memory impairment (case 1a: female vs. case 1b: male) and moderate dementia [vascular type (case 2a) vs. Alzheimer's disease (case 2b)]. Potential diagnostic workup was inquired by a structured face-to-face interview. RESULTS: 'Basic' diagnostics like history taking or laboratory investigations were considered in the first place. In case 1, neuropsychological screening was significantly more frequently considered at follow-up (19.3% in 1993 vs. 31.1% in 2001); it still would have been applied rarely in case 2 (2a: 14.1 vs. 14.8%; 2b: 23.5 vs. 24.6%). Neuroimaging remained not to be considered as a standard procedure, and only a minority of FPs would have performed a screening for depression (2001: 1a: 6.7%; 1b: 11.3%; 2a: 0.0%; 2b: 1.6%). CONCLUSIONS: With regard to dementia diagnostics in primary care, guideline adherence remained low at follow-up. Structured training efforts aiming at FPs appear to be necessary.
Publisher Karger
ISSN/ISBN 1420-8008 ; 1421-9824
edoc-URL http://edoc.unibas.ch/dok/A6004277
Full Text on edoc Available
Digital Object Identifier DOI 10.1159/000112514
PubMed ID http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18087153
ISI-Number WOS:000252591700005
Document type (ISI) Journal Article
 
   

MCSS v5.8 PRO. 0.373 sec, queries - 0.000 sec ©Universität Basel  |  Impressum   |    
06/05/2024