Data Entry: Please note that the research database will be replaced by UNIverse by the end of October 2023. Please enter your data into the system https://universe-intern.unibas.ch. Thanks

Login for users with Unibas email account...

Login for registered users without Unibas email account...

 
Effectiveness of distant healing for patients with chronic fatigue syndrome : a randomised controlled partially blinded trial (EUHEALS)
JournalArticle (Originalarbeit in einer wissenschaftlichen Zeitschrift)
 
ID 1193967
Author(s) Walach, H.; Bosch, H.; Lewith, G.; Naumann, J.; Schwarzer, B.; Falk, S.; Kohls, N.; Haraldsson, E.; Wiesendanger, H.; Nordmann, A.; Tomasson, H.; Prescott, P.; Bucher, H. C.
Author(s) at UniBasel Nordmann, Alain J.
Year 2008
Title Effectiveness of distant healing for patients with chronic fatigue syndrome : a randomised controlled partially blinded trial (EUHEALS)
Journal Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics
Volume 77
Number 3
Pages / Article-Number 158-66
Keywords chronic fatigue syndrome, distant healing, complementary and alternative medicine
Abstract BACKGROUND: Distant healing, a form of spiritual healing, is widely used for many conditions but little is known about its effectiveness. METHODS: In order to evaluate distant healing in patients with a stable chronic condition, we randomised 409 patients with chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) from 14 private practices for environmental medicine in Germany and Austria in a two by two factorial design to immediate versus deferred (waiting for 6 months) distant healing. Half the patients were blinded and half knew their treatment allocation. Patients were treated for 6 months and allocated to groups of 3 healers from a pool of 462 healers in 21 European countries with different healing traditions. Change in Mental Health Component Summary (MHCS) score (SF-36) was the primary outcome and Physical Health Component Summary score (PHCS) the secondary outcome. RESULTS: This trial population had very low quality of life and symptom scores at entry. There were no differences over 6 months in post-treatment MHCS scores between the treated and untreated groups. There was a non-significant outcome (p = 0.11) for healing with PHCS (1.11; 95% CI -0.255 to 2.473 at 6 months) and a significant effect (p = 0.027) for blinding; patients who were unblinded became worse during the trial (-1.544; 95% CI -2.913 to -0.176). We found no relevant interaction for blinding among treated patients in MHCS and PHCS. Expectation of treatment and duration of CFS added significantly to the model. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with CFS, distant healing appears to have no statistically significant effect on mental and physical health but the expectation of improvement did improve outcome.
Publisher Karger
ISSN/ISBN 0033-3190 ; 1423-0348
edoc-URL http://edoc.unibas.ch/dok/A6004202
Full Text on edoc Available
Digital Object Identifier DOI 10.1159/000116609
PubMed ID http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18277062
ISI-Number WOS:000253912100004
Document type (ISI) Journal Article, Randomized Controlled Trial
 
   

MCSS v5.8 PRO. 0.367 sec, queries - 0.000 sec ©Universität Basel  |  Impressum   |    
09/05/2024