Data Entry: Please note that the research database will be replaced by UNIverse by the end of October 2023. Please enter your data into the system https://universe-intern.unibas.ch. Thanks

Login for users with Unibas email account...

Login for registered users without Unibas email account...

 
An adherence self-report questionnaire facilitated the differentiation between nonadherence and nonresponse to antihypertensive treatment
JournalArticle (Originalarbeit in einer wissenschaftlichen Zeitschrift)
 
ID 1193656
Author(s) Zeller, Andreas; Schroeder, Knut; Peters, Tim J.
Author(s) at UniBasel Zeller, Andreas
Year 2008
Title An adherence self-report questionnaire facilitated the differentiation between nonadherence and nonresponse to antihypertensive treatment
Journal Journal of clinical epidemiology
Volume 61
Number 3
Pages / Article-Number 282-8
Keywords adherence, compliance, hypertension, self-assessment, questionnaire, validation, primary care
Mesh terms Aged; Antihypertensive Agents, administration & dosage; Epidemiologic Methods; Family Practice; Female; Humans; Hypertension, drug therapy; Male; Middle Aged; Patient Compliance, statistics & numerical data; Primary Health Care; Self Administration, statistics & numerical data; Self Disclosure; Treatment Outcome
Abstract OBJECTIVES: To evaluate, among hypertensive patients, a brief adherence self-report questionnaire (ASRQ), using electronic monitors (medical event monitoring system, MEMS) as the gold standard comparator. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: A total of 239 patients with hypertension in five general practices in Bristol, UK completed the ASRQ before and at the end of the 4-week study period. Patients were asked to choose one of six descriptions (from level 1=perfect adherence to level 6=nonadherence) to express their medication taking. The main outcome measure was "timing adherence" (correct interdose intervals) as measured through electronic monitors. RESULTS: Most patients (89%) stated perfect or nearly perfect adherence, and data from the electronic monitors showed a mean timing adherence of 88.3% (n=216). Using the cutoff of those who reported ASRQ levels 1 and 2 (all tablets taken but not always at the same time of day), a high percentage of those with comparatively high adherence according to MEMS were correctly identified (specificity, 90-93%; negative predictive value, 66-96%). However, sensitivity (detection of true nonadherers) and positive predictive value were poor to moderate (14-42% and 22-66%, respectively). CONCLUSION: The questionnaire could be a useful aid to facilitate the difficult differentiation between nonadherence and nonresponse to prescribed antihypertensive medication.
Publisher Pergamon Press
ISSN/ISBN 0895-4356
edoc-URL http://edoc.unibas.ch/dok/A6003895
Full Text on edoc No
Digital Object Identifier DOI 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.04.007
PubMed ID http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18226752
ISI-Number WOS:000253004100012
Document type (ISI) Journal Article, Multicenter Study
 
   

MCSS v5.8 PRO. 0.338 sec, queries - 0.000 sec ©Universität Basel  |  Impressum   |    
13/05/2024