Data Entry: Please note that the research database will be replaced by UNIverse by the end of October 2023. Please enter your data into the system https://universe-intern.unibas.ch. Thanks

Login for users with Unibas email account...

Login for registered users without Unibas email account...

 
Total-body contrast-enhanced MRA on a short, wide-bore 1.5-T system: intra-individual comparison of Gd-BOPTA and Gd-DOTA
JournalArticle (Originalarbeit in einer wissenschaftlichen Zeitschrift)
 
ID 1193262
Author(s) Rasmus,M; Bremerich,J; Egelhof,T; Huegli,RW; Bongartz,G; Bilecen,D
Author(s) at UniBasel Bremerich, Jens
Hügli, Rolf
Bilecen, Deniz
Bongartz, Georg
Year 2008
Title Total-body contrast-enhanced MRA on a short, wide-bore 1.5-T system: intra-individual comparison of Gd-BOPTA and Gd-DOTA
Journal European radiology
Volume 18
Number 10
Pages / Article-Number 2265-2273
Keywords MR angiography, Gd-Bopta, Gd-Dota, contrast enhancement, whole-body angiography
Abstract Total-body contrast-enhanced MRA (CE-MRA) provides information of the entire vascular system according to a one-stop-shop approach. Short, wide-bore scanners have not yet been used for total-body CE-MRA, probably due to their restricted field of view in the z-direction. The purpose of this feasibility study is to introduce an image protocol for total-body MRA on a short, wide-bore system. The protocol includes five to six table-moving steps and two injection runs. Two pharmacologically different contrast materials (CM) were applied in ten healthy volunteers in view of possible CM-dependent influences on the protocol outcome (Gd-Bopta, Gd-Dota). Differences consisted of significantly higher CNR with Gd-Bopta with a mean of 73.8+/-38.7 versus 69.1+/-34.3 (p=0.008), significantly better arterial visualization values with Gd-Dota with a mean of 1.26+/-0.44 versus 1.53+/-0.73 (p=0.003) and a tendency to less venous overlay with Gd-Dota, mean 1.19+/-0.44 and 1.34+/-0.72, respectively (p=0.065) (two-tailed Wilcoxon matched-pairs test). Overall 94% of the steps were valued as qualitatively excellent or good. The good results with both CM suggest a transfer to further patient evaluation.
Publisher Springer
ISSN/ISBN 0938-7994
edoc-URL http://edoc.unibas.ch/dok/A6003505
Full Text on edoc No
Digital Object Identifier DOI 10.1007/s00330-008-0976-z
PubMed ID http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18431575
ISI-Number WOS:000259141900029
Document type (ISI) Journal Article
 
   

MCSS v5.8 PRO. 0.355 sec, queries - 0.000 sec ©Universität Basel  |  Impressum   |    
05/05/2024