Data Entry: Please note that the research database will be replaced by UNIverse by the end of October 2023. Please enter your data into the system https://universe-intern.unibas.ch. Thanks

Login for users with Unibas email account...

Login for registered users without Unibas email account...

 
Order of application and liver toxicity in patients given BU and CY containing conditioning regimens for allogeneic hematopoietic SCT
JournalArticle (Originalarbeit in einer wissenschaftlichen Zeitschrift)
 
ID 1193138
Author(s) Cantoni, N; Gerull, S; Heim, D; Halter, J; Bucher, C; Buser, A; Tsakiris, D A; Passweg, J; Tichelli, A; Stern, M; Gratwohl, A
Author(s) at UniBasel Passweg, Jakob R.
Heim, Dominik A.
Stern, Martin Andreas
Tsakiris, Dimitrios
Year 2011
Title Order of application and liver toxicity in patients given BU and CY containing conditioning regimens for allogeneic hematopoietic SCT
Journal Bone marrow transplantation
Volume 46
Number 3
Pages / Article-Number 344-9
Keywords hematopoietic SCT, conditioning regimen, CY, BU, liver toxicity, hepatic veno-occlusive disease
Abstract BU-CY is the established non-TBI-based myeloablative conditioning regimen for allogeneic hematopoietic SCT. However, liver toxicity and hepatic veno-occlusive disease (VOD) are frequent life-threatening complications. Pharmacological considerations suggest that BU can trigger toxicity of subsequent CY. Recent animal data confirmed this hypothesis. Less liver toxicity and better outcomes were observed when mice were treated with the reversed order of CY and BU. We analyzed in this study liver toxicity and outcome in patients receiving BU-CY (16 patients) or CY-BU (59 patients). Liver function differed significantly with higher levels of liver function tests between day +10 and +30, and a higher cumulative incidence of VOD in the BU-CY cohort (2/16 (12.5%) vs 0/59 (0%), P=0.006). TRM was significantly higher in patients receiving BU-CY (cumulative incidence BU-CY 45%, CY-BU 17%, P=0.02), without yet translating into a significant survival difference (incidence for survival: BU-CY 38%, CY-BU 63%; hazard ratio 1.19 for BU-CY, 95% confidence interval 0.29-4.82, P=0.80). Rates of engraftment and relapse were not different. These data support the concepts derived from animal models in favor of CY-BU compared with traditional BU-CY and form the basis for prospective controlled comparisons.
Publisher Nature Publishing Group
ISSN/ISBN 0268-3369
edoc-URL http://edoc.unibas.ch/dok/A6003386
Full Text on edoc No
Digital Object Identifier DOI 10.1038/bmt.2010.137
PubMed ID http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20548339
ISI-Number WOS:000288164000004
Document type (ISI) Journal Article
 
   

MCSS v5.8 PRO. 0.332 sec, queries - 0.000 sec ©Universität Basel  |  Impressum   |    
12/05/2024