Data Entry: Please note that the research database will be replaced by UNIverse by the end of October 2023. Please enter your data into the system https://universe-intern.unibas.ch. Thanks

Login for users with Unibas email account...

Login for registered users without Unibas email account...

 
Bronchodilator response in residual volume in irreversible airway obstruction
JournalArticle (Originalarbeit in einer wissenschaftlichen Zeitschrift)
 
ID 1192553
Author(s) Balestra, Anna-Maria; Bingisser, Roland B; Chhajed, Prashant N; Tamm, Michael; Leuppi, Jörg D
Author(s) at UniBasel Leuppi, Jörg D.
Bingisser, Roland M.
Chhajed, Prashant Nemichand
Tamm, Michael
Year 2008
Title Bronchodilator response in residual volume in irreversible airway obstruction
Journal Swiss Medical Weekly
Volume 138
Number 17-18
Pages / Article-Number 251-5
Keywords bodyplethysmography, COPD, FEV1, hyperinflation, lung function, reversibility
Abstract BACKGROUND: Although airway obstruction, as defined by improvement of forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) and/or forced vital capacity (FVC), is irreversible in patients with COPD, they clearly seem to benefit from treatment with inhaled bronchodilators. AIMS: To assess the response pattern of residual volume (RV) compared to FEV1 after bronchodilation in patients with reversible and irreversible airway obstruction. METHODS: Changes in static lung volumes were compared with improvement in dynamic lung volumes in 396 consecutive patients undergoing reversibility testing with repeat bodyplethysmography. Reversibility was defined as improvement of FEV1 >200 ml and >12% after inhalation of fenoterol hydrobromide. RESULTS: Irreversibility was found in 297 out of 396 patients with airway obstruction. Except for total lung capacity (TLC), all parameters (residual volume [RV], vital capacity [VC], forced inspiratory vital capacity [IVC], forced vital capacity [FVC], forced expiratory volume in one second [FEV1] and the FEV1/VC ratio) showed statistically significant changes after bronchodilation in 396 patients. The multiple linear regression model adjusted for age, sex and BMI showed a non-linear relationship between DeltaFEV1 or DeltaVC compared to DeltaRV after bronchodilation. If the increase in DeltaFEV1 is lower than 0.1 L, DeltaRV remains constant. However, if the increase in DeltaFEV1 is more than 0.1 L, DeltaRV decreases too. The same is found at an increase in VC of 0.3 L. CONCLUSION: In summary, in patients with irreversible airway obstruction DeltaRV cannot be predicted by DeltaFEV1 or DeltaVC after bronchodilation. Therefore, spirometric assessment should be complemented by bodyplethysmography.
Publisher EMH
ISSN/ISBN 1424-7860
edoc-URL http://edoc.unibas.ch/dok/A5845494
Full Text on edoc No
Digital Object Identifier DOI 2008/17/smw-11992
PubMed ID http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18481230
ISI-Number WOS:000255729600001
Document type (ISI) Article
 
   

MCSS v5.8 PRO. 0.394 sec, queries - 0.000 sec ©Universität Basel  |  Impressum   |    
06/05/2024