ETHICAL ISSUES OF END-OF-LIFE DECISION MAKING: End-of-life decisions involving minors incorporate difficult choices that demand a complex and holistic approach from medical, social, ethical and legal perspectives. Research exploring the autonomy of children or adolescents in these situations is scarce. In many cases, minor's competency to refuse treatment at the end-of-life is questioned. Such treatment decisions for minors are made by their parents and/or physicians who refer to the best-interest of the minor. Although many believe that children and adolescents who live with chronic illnesses are able to understand their condition and the outcomes of an end-of-life decision, they are rarely given the option to voice their concerns and make their own choices.
STUDY PURPOSE: The purpose of this mixed methods study is to investigate the possibility of including a child or adolescent living with cancer in his or her end-of-life decision making processes and to examine associated motives and attitudes behind such decisions. In the study, quantitative data obtained will paint a reliable picture of general aspects associated with decision making in Swiss paediatric oncology situations and qualitative one-on-one interviews will help evaluate motives and attitudes of parents, primary oncologists and minors themselves when making these very difficult choices.
STUDY METHODOLOGY: Participants will be recruited from the Swiss Paediatric Oncology Group (SPOG) affiliated paediatric centres in Aarau, Basel, Bern, Bellinzona, Geneva, Luzern, St. Gallen and Zurich. The quantitative data will be captured on each case of childhood cancer diagnosed and/or treated during the study period. This data will be gathered from physicians and residents of the participating SPOG centres, and corresponding parents of the patient. They comprise our survey study participant (SSP). Data will be collected at three time points, the first T1 at diagnosis or first treatment and two follow-ups (T2 and T3, where possible).
In-depth information on this topic will be obtained using 60 interviews from our interview study sample (ISP). Twenty interviews will be held with children/adolescents aged 9 - 17, suffering from severe and possibly life threatening cancer. Half of our patient ISP sample will be recruited at the time of diagnosis from the SPOG centres and the other half from those who are in a stage of palliative care. The remaining 40 interviews will include the minors’ parents (n=20) and primary oncologists (n=20). Participants will be interviewed using a semi-structured interview guide and a short closed-ended questionnaire. The semi-structured interview will decipher various concerns, values and attitudes concerning end-of-life decision making and the extent of the child’s or adolescent’s involvement in such decision making processes. Study results will be analysed both quantitatively using SPSS and qualitatively using basic qualitative techniques and Atlas.ti.
IMPORTANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: We expect that the findings of this study will contribute significantly to the field of end-of-life decision making. The study will improve our understanding and assessment of children's and adolescents’ autonomy, delineate the extent to which a minor could be integrated into a decision making process, provide a much needed well rounded data on the issue thereby becoming a critical informational source for practitioners, researchers, ethicists and policy makers. Finally, we hope the study will be a stepping stone for future research and contribute to the political and social discussions concerning autonomy of a minor in health care decision making, nationally and internationally.
Badarau, Domnita O.; Nast, Rebecca L.; Shaw, David M.
The vulnerability of the individual benefit argument
The American journal of bioethics
JournalItem (Kommentare, Editorials, Rezensionen, Urteilsanmerk., etc. in einer wissensch. Zeitschr., JournalItem (Kommentare, Editorials, Rezensionen, Urteilsanmerk., etc. in einer wissensch. Zeitschr.