Data Entry: Please note that the research database will be replaced by UNIverse by the end of October 2023. Please enter your data into the system https://universe-intern.unibas.ch. Thanks

Login for users with Unibas email account...

Login for registered users without Unibas email account...

 
Cross-validation of bioelectrical impedance analysis for the assessment of body composition in a representative sample of 6- to 13-year-old children
JournalArticle (Originalarbeit in einer wissenschaftlichen Zeitschrift)
 
ID 105399
Author(s) Kriemler, S.; Puder, J.; Zahner, L.; Roth, R.; Braun-Fahrländer, C.; Bedogni, G.
Author(s) at UniBasel Zahner, Lukas
Puder, Jardena
Kriemler, Susi
Braun-Fahrländer, Charlotte
Year 2009
Title Cross-validation of bioelectrical impedance analysis for the assessment of body composition in a representative sample of 6- to 13-year-old children
Journal European Journal of Clinical Nutrition
Volume 63
Number 5
Pages / Article-Number 619-26
Keywords epidemiology, body composition, bioelectrical impedance analysis, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, prediction equations
Abstract BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: (1) To cross-validate tetra- (4-BIA) and octopolar (8-BIA) bioelectrical impedance analysis vs dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) for the assessment of total and appendicular body composition and (2) to evaluate the accuracy of external 4-BIA algorithms for the prediction of total body composition, in a representative sample of Swiss children. SUBJECTS/METHODS: A representative sample of 333 Swiss children aged 6-13 years from the Kinder-Sportstudie (KISS) (ISRCTN15360785). Whole-body fat-free mass (FFM) and appendicular lean tissue mass were measured with DXA. Body resistance (R) was measured at 50 kHz with 4-BIA and segmental body resistance at 5, 50, 250 and 500 kHz with 8-BIA. The resistance index (RI) was calculated as height(2)/R. Selection of predictors (gender, age, weight, RI4 and RI8) for BIA algorithms was performed using bootstrapped stepwise linear regression on 1000 samples. We calculated 95% confidence intervals (CI) of regression coefficients and measures of model fit using bootstrap analysis. Limits of agreement were used as measures of interchangeability of BIA with DXA. RESULTS: 8-BIA was more accurate than 4-BIA for the assessment of FFM (root mean square error (RMSE)=0.90 (95% CI 0.82-0.98) vs 1.12 kg (1.01-1.24); limits of agreement 1.80 to -1.80 kg vs 2.24 to -2.24 kg). 8-BIA also gave accurate estimates of appendicular body composition, with RMSE > or = 0.10 kg for arms and > or = 0.24 kg for legs. All external 4-BIA algorithms performed poorly with substantial negative proportional bias (r< or = 0.48, P
Publisher Nature Publishing Group
ISSN/ISBN 0954-3007 ; 1476-5640
edoc-URL http://edoc.unibas.ch/dok/A5253322
Full Text on edoc No
Digital Object Identifier DOI 10.1038/ejcn.2008.19
PubMed ID http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18285806
ISI-Number WOS:000265821500005
Document type (ISI) Journal Article
 
   

MCSS v5.8 PRO. 0.501 sec, queries - 0.000 sec ©Universität Basel  |  Impressum   |    
02/05/2024