Data Entry: Please note that the research database will be replaced by UNIverse by the end of October 2023. Please enter your data into the system Thanks

Login for users with Unibas email account...

Login for registered users without Unibas email account...

How to decide who decides - Membership rules and organisational frameworks in university ethics committees and their influence on ethical decision making
Project funded by own resources
Project title How to decide who decides - Membership rules and organisational frameworks in university ethics committees and their influence on ethical decision making
Principal Investigator(s) Elger, Bernice Simone
Co-Investigator(s) Jung, Corinna
Project Members Otte, Ina
Jung, Corinna
Organisation / Research unit Ethik / Bio- und Medizinethik (Elger)
Project Website
Project start 01.08.2011
Probable end 31.12.2015
Status Completed

With the emergence of numerous new possibilities in all spheres of research, and the on-going technological progress, the number of ethical commissions world-wide has increased. A growing number of research projects are developed in collaboration with ethics committees, both for advice and final approval. In universities too, important academic ethical standards have to be assured – additionally to the work of university or cantonal based research ethics committees. Different universities tend to handle the pressure to react to those new demands in a variety of ways; some of them have research ethic committees that also decide about academic misconduct such as plagiarism, while others have separate committees to deal with these problems.

Not only assigning tasks but also the composition of the committees can cause trouble for universities. How to announce new members and how to decide who could be an expert for ethical decisions is another problem universities have to face nowadays. Additionally, relationships between members (colleagues, co-authors or friends) can cause several conflicts of interests as soon as it comes down to decide about some other member’s work or student. This research project seeks to address the lack of knowledge about how organisational frameworks and membership rules structure different university committees and how these committees address their different tasks and problems.

From an ethical point of view the goal of every commission should be to make the most independent decision, including all pro and contra arguments. Therefore the way in which new members are recruited or how tasks are assigned is very important to prevent negative side effects such as conflicts of interests or dual role problems as mentioned above.

Based on a sample of 70 universities in Switzerland, Austria and Germany, this research project tries to identify what kind of future model of membership can prevent possible negative effects that may disturb the decision making progress and to elaborate a guideline for this purpose. The findings will be used to discuss different possible organisational frameworks of university ethics committees and their ethical implications.

Keywords Ethic committees
Financed by University funds

Published results ()

  ID Autor(en) Titel ISSN / ISBN Erschienen in Art der Publikation
1167160  Jung, Corinna  Die Analyse von Entscheidungen in Ethikkommissionen. Ein Blick auf die Disskussionen zur rechtlichen Regelung von Patientenverfügungen in Deutschland  978-3-89404-946-1    Publication: ConferencePaper (Artikel, die in Tagungsbänden erschienen sind) 

Cooperations ()

  ID Kreditinhaber Kooperationspartner Institution Laufzeit - von Laufzeit - bis
1016840  Elger, Bernice Simone  Bondolfi, Alberto , Prof., Thesis Referee  Faculté de Théologie, Université de Genève  01.05.2011  30.04.2014 
1016878  Elger, Bernice Simone  Ravitsky, Vardit, Prof., Co-Referee  Assistant Professor, Bioethics Programs, Faculty of Medicine University of Montreal  01.06.2011  02.03.2013 

MCSS v5.8 PRO. 0.364 sec, queries - 0.000 sec ©Universität Basel  |  Impressum   |