Data Entry: Please note that the research database will be replaced by UNIverse by the end of October 2023. Please enter your data into the system https://universe-intern.unibas.ch. Thanks

Login for users with Unibas email account...

Login for registered users without Unibas email account...

 
Prediction of live body weight using length and girth measurements for pigs in rural Western Kenya
JournalArticle (Originalarbeit in einer wissenschaftlichen Zeitschrift)
 
ID 1023017
Author(s) Mutua, Florence K.; Dewey, Catherine E.; Arimi, Samuel M.; Schelling, Esther; Ogara, William O.
Author(s) at UniBasel Schelling, Esther
Year 2011
Title Prediction of live body weight using length and girth measurements for pigs in rural Western Kenya
Journal Journal of swine health and production
Volume 19
Number 1
Pages / Article-Number 26-33
Keywords swine, weight-prediction tool, smallholder pig farmer, length and girth, market
Abstract Objectives: To develop and validate a pig weight-estimation method using body length and girth measurements. Methods: In a random sample of 288 smallholder pig farms in Western Kenya, pigs were weighed (kg) and their lengths and girths were measured (cm). Prediction models were generated using 75% of the data and validated using the remaining 25%. Weight was regressed on length and girth using mixed model analysis after controlling for village as a random effect. Models were developed for pigs categorized as young (<= 5 months), market age (5.1 months to 9.9 months), and breeding age (>= 10 months). Results: Weights (mean +/- SD) of the young, market-age, and breeding-age pigs were 12 +/- 6.1 kg, 30 +/- 11.4 kg, and 42 +/- 17.0 kg, respectively. Models for the young, market-age, and breeding-age pigs were weight = 0.18 (length) + 0.36 (girth) - 16, weight = 0.39 (length) + 0.64 (girth) - 48, and weight = 0.36 (length) + 1.02 (girth) - 74, respectively. A single prediction model for weight = 0.25 (length) + 0.56 (girth) - 32 was also developed. Weight predicted by the models was a more accurate estimate than that provided by the farmers (P < .05). Length and girth explained 88% to 91% of the total variation in weight. Implications: The weight-estimation tool will empower Kenyan farmers to have better bargaining powers when they sell their pigs and will act as an incentive to better manage their pigs through improved feeding and husbandry
Publisher AMER ASSOC SWINE VETERINARIANS
edoc-URL http://edoc.unibas.ch/dok/A6002301
Full Text on edoc No
ISI-Number WOS:000285776000006
Document type (ISI) Article
 
   

MCSS v5.8 PRO. 0.337 sec, queries - 0.000 sec ©Universität Basel  |  Impressum   |    
09/05/2024