Data Entry: Please note that the research database will be replaced by UNIverse by the end of October 2023. Please enter your data into the system https://universe-intern.unibas.ch. Thanks

Login for users with Unibas email account...

Login for registered users without Unibas email account...

 
Measuring in-cabin school bus tailpipe and crankcase PM2.5 : a new dual tracer method
JournalArticle (Originalarbeit in einer wissenschaftlichen Zeitschrift)
 
ID 1022986
Author(s) Ireson, Robert G.; Ondov, John M.; Zielinska, Barbara; Weaver, Christopher S.; Easter, Michael D.; Lawson, Douglas R.; Hesterberg, Thomas W.; Davey, Mark E.; Liu, L. -J. Sally
Author(s) at UniBasel Liu, Lee-Jane S.
Year 2011
Title Measuring in-cabin school bus tailpipe and crankcase PM2.5 : a new dual tracer method
Journal Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association
Volume 61
Number 5
Pages / Article-Number 494-503
Abstract

Exposures of occupants in school buses to on-road vehicle emissions, including emissions from the bus itself, can be substantially greater than those in outdoor settings. A dual tracer method was developed and applied to two school buses in Seattle in 2005 to quantify in-cabin fine particulate matter (PM2.5) concentrations attributable to the buses' diesel engine tailpipe (DPMtp) and crankcase vent (PMck) emissions. The new method avoids the problem of differentiating bus emissions from chemically identical emissions of other vehicles by using a fuel-based organometallic iridium tracer for engine exhaust and by adding deuterated hexatriacontane to engine oil. Source testing results showed consistent PM:tracer ratios for the primary tracer for each type of emissions. Comparisons of the PM:tracer ratios indicated that there was a small amount of unburned lubricating oil emitted from the tailpipe; however, virtually no diesel fuel combustion products were found in the crankcase emissions. For the limited testing conducted here, although PMck emission rates (averages of 0.028 and 0.099 g/km for the two buses) were lower than those from the tailpipe (0.18 and 0.14 g/km), in-cabin PMck concentrations averaging 6.8 microg/m3 were higher than DPMtp (0.91 microg/m3 average). In-cabin DPMtp and PMck concentrations were significantly higher with bus windows closed (1.4 and 12 microg/m3, respectively) as compared with open (0.44 and 1.3 microg/m3, respectively). For comparison, average closed- and open-window in-cabin total PM2.5 concentrations were 26 and 12 microg/m3, respectively. Despite the relatively short in-cabin sampling times, very high sensitivities were achieved, with detection limits of 0.002 microg/m3 for DPMtp and 0.05 microg/m3 for PMck

Publisher Air & Waste Management Association
ISSN/ISBN 1047-3289
edoc-URL http://edoc.unibas.ch/dok/A6002270
Full Text on edoc No
Digital Object Identifier DOI 10.3155/1047-3289.61.5.494
PubMed ID http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21608489
ISI-Number WOS:000292359100004
Document type (ISI) Article
 
   

MCSS v5.8 PRO. 0.366 sec, queries - 0.000 sec ©Universität Basel  |  Impressum   |    
02/05/2024