Data Entry: Please note that the research database will be replaced by UNIverse by the end of October 2023. Please enter your data into the system https://universe-intern.unibas.ch. Thanks

Login for users with Unibas email account...

Login for registered users without Unibas email account...

 
Violations of medical confidentiality: opinions of primary care physicians
JournalArticle (Originalarbeit in einer wissenschaftlichen Zeitschrift)
 
ID 1002520
Author(s) Elger, Bernice S.
Author(s) at UniBasel Elger, Bernice Simone
Year 2009
Title Violations of medical confidentiality: opinions of primary care physicians
Journal British Journal of General Practice
Volume 59
Number 567
Pages / Article-Number e344-52
Mesh terms Attitude of Health Personnel; Confidentiality, legislation & jurisprudence; Epidemiologic Methods; Humans; Physician-Patient Relations; Primary Health Care
Abstract Physicians should be able to distinguish situations where they need to protect confidentiality from those where they could be obligated to reveal information. Data are scarce concerning physician's attitudes in daily situations where violations of confidentiality are avoidable. Physicians should be aware of situations where patients are identifiable.; To solicit participation of primary care physicians in a teaching intervention and to explore participants' opinions on violations of confidentiality.; A questionnaire presented seven vignettes describing avoidable violations of confidentiality (for example, without patient consent a physician mentions a politician's illness their spouse). Participants answered on a scale of 0-3 (0=no violation and 3=serious violation). All contacted physicians were invited to a teaching session during which the study results were discussed.; Three-hundred and seventy-eight members of the Association of Physicians in Geneva (community physicians) working in primary care medicine, and 130 GPs and internists working at the University Hospital of Geneva (hospital physicians) took part. Physicians' answers were compared to responses from Swiss, UK, and other European law professors, and from 311 medical and law students in Geneva.; Between 4% (case 6) and 57% (case 2), of physicians thought that no violation occurred. Law professors attributed the scores to each case as 3, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 3; the means of physicians were: 1.9, 1.4, 0.7, 1.4 (hospital physicians)/1.9 (community physicians), 0.4, 1.6, 2.6. In most cases, physicians' and students' answers were similar. A significantly higher percentage of community physicians than hospital physicians and students thought that a physician violates confidentiality if they provide the list of their patients to the police for the investigation of the theft of a purse in the waiting room.; Physicians need to be fully aware of their obligations towards patient confidentiality. Avoidable breaches of confidentiality occur when colleagues and authorities (such as police and those in a judicial context) ask for information.
Publisher Royal College of General Practitioners
ISSN/ISBN 0960-1643 ; 1478-5242
edoc-URL https://edoc.unibas.ch/74830/
Full Text on edoc No
Digital Object Identifier DOI 10.3399/bjgp09X472647
PubMed ID http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19843415
Document type (ISI) Journal Article, Multicenter Study
 
   

MCSS v5.8 PRO. 0.401 sec, queries - 0.000 sec ©Universität Basel  |  Impressum   |    
29/04/2024